The law firm of Janet R. Feeley, L.L.C. is committed to providing aggressive legal representation in the areas of Family Law, Criminal Law, and Personal Injury.  Now in its seventh year of practice, the firm’s mission is to provide quality legal service to each client.
 
Ms. Feeley recognizes that a good attorney-client relationship is essential to a successful outcome for the client.  It is for that reason that Ms. Feeley offers a free initial consultation to potential clients so that you may personally meet with your attorney to explore the legal questions you may have and to determine your comfort level with the attorney before committing to a contractual relationship. 
 
Begin by calling 480-897-0044.

 
 
Recent News
Law.com - Newswire
The day's top legal stories accompanied with summaries.
  • Howrey to Cut Between 20 and 30 Partners
    Robert Ruyak, Howrey's managing partner, confirmed Thursday that the firm plans to cut between 20 and 30 partners. The firm's profits per partner dropped 35 percent in 2009, and the acquisition of high-profile laterals created internal client conflicts that hurt some partners, sources say. Ruyak says that the hope is to keep the partners at Howrey until helping them land elsewhere. The plan is to position Howrey for a fast recovery, and Ruyak says he believes the firm can thrive by focusing on its core litigation practices.
  • DLA Piper Sued Over Associate's Alleged Discovery Snafu
    What may have been a case of oversharing on the part of a DLA Piper associate has dragged the firm into court to defend a legal malpractice lawsuit. Former client George Sutton Associates, a San Diego software company, claimed in a complaint filed on Tuesday that DLA Piper unlawfully "rifled through" its files and disclosed confidential information to a third party, resulting in about $1.2 million in damages.
  • 3rd Circuit Asked to Clarify Student Internet Speech Cases
    Cutting-edge questions in the First Amendment arena have recently stemmed from clashes between students and school districts over limits put on speech posted on social networking sites. Now lawyers on both sides of the issue are urging the 3rd Circuit to vacate two seemingly conflicting decisions by two different three-judge panels, and to hold rearguments before the full court. Both cases involved high school students suspended for creating fake MySpace pages on their home computers ridiculing their principals.